Just saying

I hate "medleys".

Mike Huckabee

Well Nugget said look, so I looked -

And here are 3 problems I see with Huckabee - and I ask the fair bloggers - why should I not care? Should I withold all support for these? It is kind of like - other than these, the guy is OK...but these are pretty big.

1] He does not believe in evolution.
He argues that this should not even be a presidential election issue. I kind of agree - but I cannot get it out of my head that a man who is going to run the country does not believe in this basic scientific principle which is critical in understanding things like biology and immunology. If he were a "creative designer" I could go for that - and forget about it. I beleive that atheistic evolutionists are every bit as closed minded as creationists who do not believe in dinosours. But I digress...The problem is that Huckabee does not believe in evolution, because he does not want to believe that we "came from apes" - This does not show a great degree of nuanced thinking necessary to be president. Kind of like, uh Mike, there is more to it than that...
Not believing in evolution is different than an argument for/against something like gay marraige where a politician is making a moral / legal decision using some internal compass to guide them. This is like saying buoyancy / gravity / mytosis do not exist because I find no reference to the Krebs cycle in Galations.

2] In his mind, Irag is not a huge mistake - nothing about when, how, why, under what circumstance we should get the hell out of there. And this is a place where the president has some influence.

3] An extension of 2 - if we are going to stay there - we have to pay somehow. If we were to eliminate all serivces for indigent people and shoot them instead, I think we would still come up short. In the history of government there has never been a war without some kind of sacrifice asked of the population until now. Some how we need to pay for this thing - or we see more debt to our real and present enemies, Saudi Arabia & China. And no - we should not fight them - we should just quit pretending that doing everything they ask is good for us. And we should also quit spending like drunken sailors on leave with a credit card.

I have said this before and I will say it again - the only thing worse than a tax and spend liberal is a no tax and HUGE spend conservative.

Man I miss the balanced budget / surplus under that liberal spender Bill Clinton - whose wife is nothing like him.



Of course - there is one issue that will make me ignore all others. If Huckabee argues that the USA should forbid private money in public elections [so all money for elections comes from the public trough] and I vote for him even if he thinks God uses little green elves to do the work required of a living planet.

Anyone like playing "disk" at the beach?

This just spotted in the CSUS parking lot...

"Lost your balls?

Try Disc Golf"

Well - I am a fan of Bumper Stickers, vanity plates, and the metal thing that goes around your license plate as much as the next guy. But this is political correctness run amock. It is not freaking "disc" golf - it is FRISBEE golf.

As Nugget, Painter, and Marty can attest – perhaps the number 1 attraction to FRISBEE golf is the ability to play it with 1 hand – leaving the other free to hold beer with.
So here is a guideline for “disc” golfers…

1] If you have any gear whatsoever – other than your Frisbees – you are a loser.

2 ]If you play disc golf competitively – you are a loser.

3] If you call Frisbee golf – disc golf – you are a loser.

4] If you practice because you want to be better – [as opposed to a relaxing activity] – you are a loser.

5]If you belong to any disc golf associations – you are a loser.

6] If you “advertise” you affinity and love for “disc” golf on your automobile – you are a loser.

7]And finally – if you blog about disc golf, disc golfers, or bumper stickers in any way you are a loser…

Anyone up for some Ultimate Disc?

Nazis, Rockets, and Faustian deals

If you get a chance to see this Nova - don't miss it. I caught it the other night. Endlessly fascinating for a multitude of reasons...disgusting, inspirational, on and on.

As far as TV goes this is 10 stars out of 10 - and if any of you do watch it - please let me know what you think.



http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/sputnik/vonbraun.html
A kind of Faustian shadow may be discerned in—or imposed on—the fascinating career of Wernher von Braun: a man so possessed of a vision, of an intellectual hunger, that any accommodation may be justified in its pursuit.
—Washington Star editorial, 20 June 1977
Nonetheless, he still managed to produce three more fundamental contributions as a U.S. immigrant and citizen: making spaceflight a reality to the public, leading the team that launched the first American satellite in 1958, and managing the development of the gigantic launch vehicles that sent humans to the Moon. The Saturns were his masterworks; astonishingly, not one failed catastrophically in flight.
The sum total of his accomplishments makes von Braun the most influential rocket engineer and spaceflight advocate of the twentieth century. Others—above all Konstantin Tsiolkovsky, Hermann Oberth, and Robert Goddard—proved that spaceflight was technically feasible. Goddard went further, developing the world's first liquid-fuel rocket, but he was a poor engineer and one constitutionally unsuited to leading a larger group. It fell to the second generation of rocket and space enthusiasts—chief among them being von Braun and Sergei Korolev [the Soviet engineer behind Sputnik]—to realize the founders' vision by serving their governments as engineering managers in the development of ballistic missiles, then by selling those governments on the idea of spaceflight. In terms of firsts, Korolev's achievements undoubtedly exceeded von Braun's. His team launched the world's first ICBM, the first satellite, the first object to escape the Earth, the first object to hit the Moon, and the first man and the first woman in space. But his postwar accomplishments were founded on German technology: by Stalin's order, he started over in 1945–46 by copying the V-2.

What I have been trying to say...all these years

SQL Server relies on the Write-Ahead Logging (WAL) protocol to maintain the Atomicity, Consistency,
Isolation, and Durability (ACID) properties of the database and to ensure data integrity. WAL relies on
stable media capabilities. A solution must comply with this stable media intention.




...Please, somebody, anybody, kill me now.

Keb' Mo' is really great - but that has nothing to do with the death of Sacster.blogspot.com

Brad –
Is it possible that people have tired of Democrats, Republicans, Sally Field, Bad 80s music, Herman Melville, and Jack Kerouac? Or is there a darker, deeper force at work – beyond our comprehension???
Of course no one would ever get sick of my sweet assed response to Jim’s Sally Field waste of bytes…but I digress.
By the way – what did Dave say he was going to do if Hillary Clinton became president. Not sure – but I know it was funny to think about. And now if Dave is a man of his word – he will have to do it.
Don’t get me wrong – I don’t support that DINO [Democrat in name only] – but I do support Nugget having to do outrageous shit as a result of a flippant comment he made thinking – that will never happen.
Anyway – I am not sure what killed sacster.blogspot.com – but in my “Synchronistic Wanderings” - I have developed a theory.
http://www.amazon.com/Synchronistic-Wanderings-Pat-Benatar/dp/B00001R3DD

They were so ecstatic when the letter arrived
A certified genius at the age of five
They planned his future so carefullyHe was everything they hoped he'd be
He was a model child, a devoted son
Loved and admired by everyone
He played out every role, a "T.V. hero"
He lived his life in a video fantasy

He was good at school, never failed a grade
They gave him hopes and dreams, and taught him not to hate
He had rules he learned to break for fun
Now he's hidin', `cause his fingerprints on the gun

Why'd ya have to do it Evil Genius?
Was it justified in your mind?
Why'd ya put us through it Evil Genius?
Was it justified in your mind anytime you held a grudge?

Was it something said that pushed you over the line?
Your best interests were in our minds
You kept it so well hidden, we never knew
No one ever expected anything like this from you

Why'd ya have to do it Evil Genius?
Was it justified in your mind?
Why'd ya put us through it Evil Genius?
Was it justified in your mind anytime you held a grudge?

Why'd ya have to do it Evil Genius?
Was it justified in your mind?
Why'd ya put us through it Evil Genius?
Was it justified in your mind anytime you held a grudge?

Of course – “Evil Genius” is the Macbeth of our time – so tragic, so sad…

The gripper is how at first the speaker in the poem is referring to the evil genius as "he" - then changes their point of view to "you" and you realize the psychic pain that the speaker is in because the evil genius is actually, gasp, hers!

Or they make a mistake that high school sophomores get dinged for on their essays, by changing voice in the middle of a story, essay, etc...

Either way - that dude should not have killed sacster.blogspot.com

Sacster, of course, cannot be killed, and it grows and grows and grows and the evil genius can never stop it

HA HA HA [ummm say this one in an evil genius voice to make it funny.]